Too small to fill a room.
You get the same curriculum a 500-person company gets, at a pace one team can absorb, without booking a week out of everyone's calendar.
The SkillSpout Current. Custom training on the tools your company already uses, help making your real workflows AI-ready, and the assistants your team builds along the way -- with a live check-in closing every stage.

Everyone gets the same curriculum. Not everyone can sit in the same room.Live training works in a narrow band -- enough people to justify a session, few enough to afford it, all reachable at once. Most companies sit outside that band in one direction or the other.
You get the same curriculum a 500-person company gets, at a pace one team can absorb, without booking a week out of everyone's calendar.
Training 40 people in a room is a program. Training 900 is a logistics exercise that never finishes. This is how a whole organization moves, by business unit, on the same material.
The subscription is what carries it afterward. Every participant in a SkillSpout training engagement gets two months included.
First, we survey the team. Who does what, which tools they already have, where their time goes. That survey is what the content gets built against -- your platform, their department, their role. It's the reason nobody gets a generic catalog.
Then a Vision & Direction session. Leadership decides what AI is actually for at your company before anyone starts learning it. This is where the program gets pointed at something specific, and it's why the training lands on your real priorities instead of general capability.
Then the courses, one per two-week sprint, each closing with a live check-in.
What happens inside a stage. People work through their own material at their own pace -- video tracked to their role, prompt libraries kept current as the models change. They apply it to a real workflow from their own job, and they build assistants they keep afterward.
The check-in closes it. Each team meets for a facilitated 60-minute virtual working session with a SkillSpout specialist. People show what they built, stuck points get handled in the room, and the next stage gets framed against that team's real work.
Insights shows you where it's landing. Who's moving, who hasn't started, which teams need a hand. It's self-serve, so you're not waiting on a report from us. This structure exists because adoption after training usually fades within two months.
It doesn't end when the program does. The subscription continues, so your team keeps the library, the prompt collections, the assistants they built, and the updates as the platforms change. Check-ins can continue quarterly.
A 90-person division, five teams: customer service, plus HR, marketing and sales.
Everyone works through the same stage over two weeks, on their own schedule, on material tracked to their department. At the end each team meets for an hour -- five sessions, one per team -- where two or three people show what they built and the rest get their sticking points handled.
Then the next stage opens.
The same shape works at other sizes. A 30-person company runs it as one or two teams. A 900-person organization runs it by business unit, same two weeks, same check-in, more teams. What changes is the number of groups, not the program.
No. A library gives everyone the same catalog and hopes they watch it. Here the content is built around each person's role and the platform your company runs, their own workflows get worked on, they build assistants for their real work, and every stage closes with a live session.
No. For a lot of companies this is the training. For companies already training with us, it's what carries it afterward.
Not at all. It's built for people whose job has nothing to do with technology, on the work they already do.
That's the problem it was built for. The pace creates a deadline, the check-in creates a reason to have something to show, and Insights means a stalled team is visible in the first two weeks rather than at renewal.
Their workflows looked at and changed, assistants built on their own work that keep running, a prompt library for their role, and a team that's been through it together.
Yes -- it's how the program starts. Leadership decides what AI is for before anyone begins learning it. It's scoped separately from the subscription, so it shows up as its own line when we put a plan together.
Probably! Let's talk!